The National Interest magazine recently reported on 'A Tale of Two Monasteries'.
The National Interest is a prominent conservative American bi-monthly international affairs magazine published by the Nixon Center. The National Interest pays attention to broad ideas and the way in which cultural and social differences, technological innovations, history, and religion impact the behavior of states.
The published article can be read in its entirety below.
The Tale of Two Monasteries
by Thomas de Waal
Read this article on the website of The National Interest
On August 15 this year, a remarkable event took place at Soumela monastery in northeastern Turkey in the beautiful wooded valleys that the Greeks call the Pontus. The Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople celebrated the first service in the ruined monastery since 1923, the year when the Pontic Greeks were deported from their homeland.
It took many years of quiet diplomacy by church officials, non-governmental activists, mayors and--an important group in this rapprochement--musicians, for Greeks and Turks to bridge their differences sufficiently to let the Soumela service take place. An American photographer of Pontic Greek origin, Eleftherios ("Ted") Kostans was in the church and wrote me his impressions:
Only a year before I was with Eleftherios outside the monastery walls on August 15, the Feast of the Virgin Day, when it all went badly wrong and a Turkish museum curator broke up what she declared to be an unauthorized service.
This year's breakthrough was clearly authorized at the top, another move in the tentative "Christian opening" made by the governing AK Party, as it challenges some of the desiccated doctrines of the Turkish state. Plenty of powerful nationalist forces vehemently opposed the service as an invitation to "Christian fifth columnists" to infiltrate a Turkish state museum. But now a precedent has been set, hopefully the Soumela liturgy will become an annual event.
None of this can be said a parallel service planned for September 19: the first liturgy for more than 90 years in the 10th century Armenian church of Akhtamar on Lake Van. The Armenian patriarch of Istanbul is due to officiate in what would again be a historic event--Armenians' return to a place that from which they were bloodily driven out in 1915. Thousands of Armenians are due to visit, with many of them staying in ordinary Turkish homes.
Unfortunately, unlike Soumela, the Akhtamar service is threatening to turn into a disaster. Armenian officials and clergy are saying they will not come because the Turkish government has not carried through on its promise to reinstall a cross on the monastery dome. The government, currently locked in a fight over the September 12 constitutional referendum, is doing nothing to correct this.
I understand the concerns of some Armenians who won't go to Akhatmar. They want to see rapprochement with Turkey, but they believe that the church service is a distraction from the political business that the Turkish government flunked when it failed to press ahead with ratifying the Protocols on normalizing relations, signed last year in Zurich.
But some Armenians are going much further, denouncing the whole event and calling for a boycott. One commentator called the liturgy a "scandalous show" and Armenians who are going there "tools of Turkish propaganda." These people, who oppose any incremental changes with Turkey and demand nothing less than a full Turkish government apology for committing Genocide in 1915 are in a curious way the allies of the Turkish nationalists who oppose rapprochement for opposite reasons. If the Akhtamar service is a failure, it will be a blow against those liberal Turks, such as the governor of Van province and in the presidential administration, who are still pushing for normalization with Armenia.
I am certain of two things: There will eventually be a breakthrough in Armenian-Turkish relations. And when it happens, both Armenians and Turks will say things about the other and about the past that they are not saying now. The issue is all in the timing and how to build enough mutual trust to stiffen the resolve of the leaders who will do the final deal.
Thomas de Waal is a senior associate for the Caucasus with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.